Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900 +25%
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Feb 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
480
20
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

30W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Turks
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
Turks GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy