Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA TITAN Ada

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA TITAN Ada

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 800W)
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 223% (2520MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1152GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
18112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
TITAN Ada +18517%
92.9 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
2235 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1152GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
144
320
Shading Units
18432
20
TMUs
576
8
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
144
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1452 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
92.90 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.90 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1452 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
800W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
AD102
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
AD102-450-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy