Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD FirePro W600

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
FirePro W600 +53%
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
512
20
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy