Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 112% (1650MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300 +746%
4.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Aug 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1280
20
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
85W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Navi 14
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy