Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250 vs ATI FireGL V8650

AMD Radeon R7 250 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
192 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 +62%
0.717 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Aug 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

55W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
R600
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy