Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Lower TDP (55W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +374%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Nov 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Tahiti
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy