Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250 vs ATI FirePro V3700

AMD Radeon R7 250 vs ATI FirePro V3700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
472 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 +1020%
0.717 TFLOPS
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Aug 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
40
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

55W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
RV620
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
RV620 GL (215-0670004)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy