CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
VS
AMD Radeon R7 250
NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 315 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 55W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250
+1493%
0.717 TFLOPS
GeForce 315 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250
VS
GeForce 315 OEM
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Feb 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
512
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
55W
TDP
33W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cape Verde
GPU Name
GT218
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
GT218-300-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
2
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD Radeon RX 560DX
3
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP
4
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700
5
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs ATI Radeon HD 5770
6
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB
7
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs MTT S70
8
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
9
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition
10
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X
Related News
1
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
2
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
3
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
4
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
5
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
6
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
7
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
8
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
9
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
10
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy