Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 640GB)
400 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250 +166%
0.717 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Nov 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
640MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
512
Shading Units
112
32
TMUs
28
16
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

55W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
G80
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy