Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250X vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

AMD Radeon R7 250X vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250X
1.216 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +371%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Apr 2017
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
2304
40
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

15.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
38.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
1216 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
76.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Cape Verde XT
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy