Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

AMD Radeon R7 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 260
1.536 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +85%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Jun 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
768
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
48.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
1.536 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
96.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
90W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
TU106
Bonaire PRO
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy