Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI FireGL V8650

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265 +330%
1.894 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Aug 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
R600
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy