Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Jan 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV516
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy