Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI FireMV 2260 PCIe x1

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI FireMV 2260 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2260 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
984 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2260 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265 +4635%
1.894 TFLOPS
FireMV 2260 PCIe x1
0.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Jan 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
40
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.00 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
15W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV620
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy