CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View
VS
AMD Radeon R7 265
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
984 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265
+5818%
1.894 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
VS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Jan 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
2
1024
Shading Units
40
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV620
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI Radeon HD 5670 640SP Edition
2
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM
3
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA NVS 300
4
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
5
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 OEM
6
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX
7
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB
8
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
9
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI
10
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy