Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
984 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265 +5818%
1.894 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Jan 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
2
1024
Shading Units
40
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV620
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy