Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD FirePro S9150

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +167%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Aug 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
44
1024
Shading Units
2816
64
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Hawaii
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
235W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy