Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD FirePro W4000

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265 +49%
1.894 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Aug 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy