Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD FirePro W600

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265 +146%
1.894 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Jun 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
8
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy