CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD FirePro W600
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD FirePro W600
VS
AMD Radeon R7 265
AMD FirePro W600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265
+146%
1.894 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
VS
FirePro W600
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Jun 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
8
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 265
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs AMD Radeon R7 265
3
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI Radeon HD 5670 640SP Edition
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 265
5
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM
6
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon R7 265
7
ATI Radeon HD 5850 vs AMD Radeon R7 265
8
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
9
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD FirePro W4300
10
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy