Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 1030 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 59% (1468MHz vs 925MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265 +68%
1.894 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 1030
1.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
May 2017
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1228 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1468 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.49 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.23 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.62 GFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1127 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.23 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GP108
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
GP108-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy