Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 38.02GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265 +1215%
1.894 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Dec 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
38.02GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
G94B
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy