AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

VS

AMD Radeon R7 265 NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages

Lower TDP (150W vs 1000W)

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages

Released 9 years and 11 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 99% (1837MHz vs 925MHz)

More VRAM (96GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)

15872 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R7 265

1.894 TFLOPS

B200 SXM 192 GB +3177%

62.08 TFLOPS

Radeon R7 265

VS

B200 SXM 192 GB

Graphics Card

Feb 2014

Release Date

Jan 2024

Volcanic Islands

Generation

Tesla Blackwell

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz

Base Clock

1665 MHz

925 MHz

Boost Clock

1837 MHz

1400 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz

Memory

2GB

Memory Size

96GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

HBM3e

256bit

Memory Bus

4096bit

179.2GB/s

Bandwidth

4100GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

132

16

Compute Units

-

1024

Shading Units

16896

64

TMUs

528

32

ROPs

24

-

Tensor Cores

528

-

RT Cores

-

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

256 KB (per SM)

512 KB

L2 Cache

50 MB

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

44.09 GPixel/s

59.20 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

969.9 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

248.3 TFLOPS

1.894 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

62.08 TFLOPS

118.4 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

31.04 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn

GPU Name

GB100

Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)

GPU Variant

-

GCN 1.0

Architecture

Blackwell

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

5 nm

2.8 billion

Transistors

208 billion

212 mm²

Die Size

Unknown

Board Design

150W

TDP

1000W

450 W

Suggested PSU

1400 W

2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

No outputs

1x 6-pin

Power Connectors

-

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)

DirectX

N/A

4.6

OpenGL

N/A

1.2

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

N/A

-

CUDA

9.0

5.1

Shader Model

N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI Radeon HD 5670 640SP Edition

2

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

3

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060

4

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 OEM

5

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

6

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX

7

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB

8

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce 6200 X2 PCI

9

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP

10

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI Radeon HD 5850

Related News

1

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

2

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

3

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

4

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

5

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

6

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

7

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

8

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

9

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

10

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance