Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265 +319%
1.894 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450 OEM
0.451 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Sep 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
902 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
57.73GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
1024
Shading Units
144
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.698 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.79 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
451.0 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.58 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
106W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GF106
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy