Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti 's Advantages
Lower TDP (110W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265 +32%
1.894 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
1.425 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Oct 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
86.40GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.85 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.39 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1425 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
110W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GK106
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
GK106-220-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy