CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
VS
AMD Radeon R7 265
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X
+354%
8.602 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
VS
Radeon R9 FURY X
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Jun 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
64
1024
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
Fiji
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
275W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM
2
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI Radeon HD 5670 640SP Edition
3
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA NVS 300
4
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP
5
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 10 GB
6
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX
7
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
8
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs ATI FirePro V7760
9
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
10
AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450
Related News
1
Noctua Announce NH-D15 G2 Air Cooler and NF-A14x25r G2 Fan
2
The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation
3
Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits
4
Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU
5
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
6
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
7
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
8
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
9
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
10
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy