Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +332%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Aug 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
175W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Fiji
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy