Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265X OEM and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 93% (1785MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265X OEM
2.368 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX +112%
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Feb 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
1280
Shading Units
1408
80
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
74.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
2.368 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
125W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Curacao
GPU Name
TU116
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy