Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs ATI FirePro V4900

AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265X OEM and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265X OEM +208%
2.368 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Nov 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
480
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
74.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.368 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Curacao
GPU Name
Turks
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy