Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265X OEM and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 168.0GB/s)
AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 78% (1645MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265X OEM
2.368 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 +95%
4.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
May 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1327 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
1408
80
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
74.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
2.368 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Curacao
GPU Name
Navi 14
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XE
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy