Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM and 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
264 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 340 OEM +318%
0.599 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.67GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
120
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.376 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.752 GTexel/s
-
-
-
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
142.6 GFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
RV630
-
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy