CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
168 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 350 OEM
+50%
0.806 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350 OEM
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Sep 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
27
6
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
216
24
TMUs
72
8
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
8.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
806.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
50.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
GT200
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Board Design
65W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
2
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
3
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs AMD Radeon R5 435 OEM
4
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
5
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
6
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 5850
7
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6350
8
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
9
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 7500 XT
10
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 5690
Related News
1
The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation
2
Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits
3
Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU
4
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
5
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
6
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
7
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
8
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
9
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
10
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy