Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 A260 vs AMD FirePro M8900

AMD Radeon R7 A260 vs AMD FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 A260 and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 A260 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock980MHz
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 A260
0.752 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900 +73%
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Apr 2011
All-In-One
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
980 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
960
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.840 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
23.52 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
752.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
Blackcomb
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy