Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 A260 vs AMD FirePro W4150M

AMD Radeon R7 A260 vs AMD FirePro W4150M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 A260 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 A260 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (980MHz vs 850MHz)
AMD FirePro W4150M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 A260 +15%
0.752 TFLOPS
FirePro W4150M
0.652 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Unknown
All-In-One
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
980 MHz
Boost Clock
850 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.840 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.800 GPixel/s
23.52 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
752.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
652.8 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
Mars
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy