AMD Radeon R7 A265 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 A265 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock825MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
376 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 A265
+3065%
0.633 TFLOPS
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
0.02 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2014
Release Date
Jun 2008
All-In-One
Generation
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
725 MHz
Base Clock
-
825 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
11.23GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
384
Shading Units
8
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.116 GPixel/s
19.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.116 GTexel/s
-
-
-
633.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
39.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
13W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Opal
GPU Name
G98
Opal XT
GPU Variant
G98-700-U2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
80 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
4.0
