Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 A265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M

AMD Radeon R7 A265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 A265 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock825MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (60.80GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 A265 +69%
0.633 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280M
0.374 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Mar 2009
All-In-One
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-IV

Clock Speeds

725 MHz
Base Clock
-
825 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
60.80GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
128
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.360 GPixel/s
19.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.44 GTexel/s
-
-
-
633.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
374.5 GFLOPS
39.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
G92
Opal XT
GPU Variant
N10E-GTX
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy