Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 A265 vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M

AMD Radeon R7 A265 vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 and 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 A265 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock825MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 A265 +1523%
0.633 TFLOPS
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jan 2010
All-In-One
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

725 MHz
Base Clock
-
825 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
384
Shading Units
16
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.140 GPixel/s
19.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.280 GTexel/s
-
-
-
633.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
39.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
11W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
GT218
Opal XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy