Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 A360 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

AMD Radeon R7 A360 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A360 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1515MHz vs 1125MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 A360
0.864 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile +259%
3.103 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2020
All-In-One
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1100 MHz
Base Clock
1380 MHz
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
1515 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.48 GPixel/s
27.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.96 GTexel/s
864.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.205 TFLOPS
864.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.103 TFLOPS
54.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Meso
GPU Name
TU117
Meso XT (216-0864018)
GPU Variant
N18P-G61-MP2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy