Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA A2

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA A2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 90% (1770MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
A2 +375%
4.531 TFLOPS
VS
A2

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Nov 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1440 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
512
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GA107
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
Unknown
123 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy