Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FireGL V8650

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
192 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +116%
0.952 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Aug 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
R600
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy