Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 65W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Jan 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
-
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
RV516
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy