Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
504 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +4227%
0.952 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
0.022 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Dec 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
512
Shading Units
8
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.268 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.268 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
G98
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy