Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +253%
0.952 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 430
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Oct 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
512
Shading Units
96
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
49W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GF108
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
GF108-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy