Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +37%
0.952 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
0.693 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
May 2013
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.216 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
692.7 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
28.86 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GK208
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
GK208-301-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy