Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 512MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 106W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +111%
0.952 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450 OEM
0.451 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Sep 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
902 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
57.73GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
512
Shading Units
144
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.698 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.79 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
451.0 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.58 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
106W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GF106
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy