Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 375W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (134.4GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 +13%
1.078 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
134.4GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
512
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.86 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.73 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1078 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GF100
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy