Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 140W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1032MHz vs 930MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 +108%
1.981 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Sep 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
980 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
1032 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
144.2GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
960
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.64 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
82.56 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.981 TFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
82.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
140W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GK104
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy