Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 0% (930MHz vs 928MHz)
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB +461%
5.345 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
875 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
928 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
2880
32
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.345 TFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GK110B
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy