Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 120W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1178MHz vs 930MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.2GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 960 +153%
2.413 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Jan 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1127 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
112.2GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.70 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
75.39 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.413 TFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
75.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
120W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GM206
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
GM206-300-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy