Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 5830

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 5830

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5830 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 175W)
ATI Radeon HD 5830 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 5830 +88%
1.792 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Feb 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1120
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.792 TFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Cypress
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
Cypress LE (215-0735047)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy