Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6950

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon HD 6950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock930MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 6950 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6950 +136%
2.253 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Dec 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1408
32
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.253 TFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
563.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Cayman
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO (215-0807019)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy