Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro V520

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro V520

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 225W)
AMD Radeon Pro V520 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 72% (1600MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V520 +674%
7.373 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Dec 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.4 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.75 TFLOPS
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.373 TFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
460.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Navi 12
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
Navi 12
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
Unknown
123 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy